Philip,
as long as you don't work with our "api" and "example" packages, you
don't need Maven at all. Talking about myself… I'm only using the
Maven plugin to dissolve dependencies. I've posted this to the list,
so maybe someone else can help you with that?
Christian
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Philip Oliver
<phil3(a)olivercomputing.com> wrote:
> Christian - I was trying to update my Eclipse installation (Galileo SR2 on OS X) with the maven integration and it blew up my Eclipse installation. Not a BaseX problem but still annoying. I don't know much about Maven but I think I'd prefer to just build from the command line if possible using 'mvn' which is what I was doing with the 'mvn install'. Can you say what I should do in order to use 'mvn' at the command line (rather than Eclipse) to build BaseX to get a jar?
>
> Phil
>
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Christian Grün wrote:
>
>> Philip,
>>
>> thanks for the hint, it was work in progress. All JUnit tests should
>> now run as expected. If not, just tell us (we note that many people
>> have difficulties with the Eclipse/Maven integration, so I'm not sure
>> if the current configuration meets all demands).
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Philip Oliver
>> <phil3(a)olivercomputing.com> wrote:
>>> Christian,
>>>
>>> In light of the bug report, I updated my SVN repository copy and did a 'mvn install', and got the following errors in the automated tests:
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> T E S T S
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> Running org.basex.test.query.NamespaceTest
>>> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.418 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>> Running org.basex.test.query.FTTest
>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.09 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>> Running org.basex.test.cs.SemaphoreTest
>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.004 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>> Running org.basex.test.cs.PermissionTest
>>> BaseX 6.1.1 [Server]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know how significant these are, or if it's a result of me not properly building BaseX, but FYI.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>