Hi Björn,
hi Max,

yes, we kind of missed that not-so-subtle-change:
Docker basex/dba is now fixed to the DBA that allows remote connections.
https://hub.docker.com/r/basex/dba/

`docker pull basex/dba:latest`

Should bring back that version.

We are currently figuring out ways to bundle the current dba alongsside `basex/basexhttp`.

I’ll keep you posted.

Best from Konstanz,
Michael

Am 01.02.2017 um 14:52 schrieb Maximilian Gärber <mgaerber@arcor.de>:

Hi,
this is how it used to be:

basex/basexhttp : the standard basex distribution for docker
basex/dba: only the DBA project

The idea was to have both running independently where you would
connect from /dba to /basexhttp

But this does not work anymore since 8.6

So for the time being, just use basex/dba prior to 8.6




2017-02-01 12:21 GMT+01:00 Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Björn,

a) Does this mean that since Version 8.6 there is no officially supported web interface for basex?

There still is. DBA is still part of BaseX, but it doesn’t provide
means to connect remotely.

b) What is the difference between the basex/basexhttp and basex/dba images? (I think the documentation at https://hub.docker.com/r/basex/basexhttp/ is now misleading)

Personally, I can’t say anything about Docker. Maybe someone else on
the list knows more?

Christian


--
Michael Seiferle, BaseX GmbH, http://www.basexgmbh.de
|-- Firmensitz: Blarerstrasse 56, 78462 Konstanz
|-- Registergericht Freiburg, HRB: 708285, Geschäftsführer:
|   Dr. Christian Grün, Dr. Alexander Holupirek, Michael Seiferle
`-- Fon: +49 7531 916 82 77