Would there be major code changes required to create collection if
I migrate from basex671 to basex-7.3 jar.
Because in the first step I am getting
new BXCollection(collection, true, objContext) - Can't find symbol
constructor.
It is taking BxDatabase as third argument. I need to see any example
codes on creating collection using basex7.3 , so that I can do it on my own.
Would you please help me on this.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Riyaz Shaik,
In10^s Technologies Ltd.
/"What you risk reveals what you value."/
On 10/18/2012 3:02 PM, Lukas Kircher wrote:
> Hi Riyaz,
>
> that's a good starting point - a huge load of things changed
> with BaseX since 671, so just have a look.
>
> Are you using the full text index?
>
> Regards,
> Lukas
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, riyaz
riyaz.basha@intense.in wrote:
>
>> Dear Lukas,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>>
>> 1) I am using Basex671.jar and basex-api.jar. Seems it is not latest
>> one. I will check with latest jar and update you.
>>
>> and also
>>
>> 2) while iterating in a for loop we are adding one by one xml and
>> where each xml is of 100kb on an average to collection.
>>
>> 199MB of multiple files( around 2000+ xml documents) to a single
>> collection is taking 440 mb on harddisk.
>>
>> //strAtr is a string array and contains file paths
>> for (int j = 0; j < strAtr.length; j++) {
>> new Add(strAtr[j]).execute(context);
>> }
>>
>> Please let me know if anything can be done, or anything needed for more
>> clarification.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Riyaz Shaik,
>> In10^s Technologies Ltd.
>>
>> * "What you risk reveals what you value."*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/18/2012 2:18 PM, Lukas Kircher wrote:
>>
>> just a little addition:
>>
>> Depending on the nature of the document you add
>> and the kind of active indexes there will be some
>> overhead in size and space.
>>
>> 400MB/3min for a 199MB document sounds a little
>> special though ...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Lukas Kircher
lukaskircher1@gmail.com lukaskircher1@gmail.comwrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Riyaz,
>>
>> 1) do you use the [latest stable snapshot] or [latest release] of BaseX?
>>
>> 2) Could you equip us with some more facts about your case, like the
>> exact query, the document (structure) or maybe even an SSCCE? You
>> could also send it directly to one of us if you don't want to post it to
>> the
>> list.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lukas
>>
>>
>> [latest stable snapshot]
http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/
>> [latest release]
http://files.basex.org/releases/7.3/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:54 AM, riyaz
riyaz.basha@intense.in riyaz.basha@intense.in wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> This is Riyaz from Hyderabad , India. I have been using X query
>> since one and half year. I need help on the following query.
>>
>> When I add xmls of 199 MB to create collection using " new
>> Add(xmlfilepath).execute(
>> context)" (JAVA), it is taking 440 MB on hard disk
>> and 3 mins to complete the
>> process. Is there any other way to reduce the size and time?
>>
>> Thanks a ton in advance and would appreciate the earliest response.
>> Please help me on this.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Riyaz Shaik,
>> In10^s Technologies Ltd.
>>
>> * "What you risk reveals what you value."*
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BaseX-Talk mailing listBaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
>>
>>
>>
>>