Hello,
as a rather unexperienced xquery and basex user, I'm puzzled by the timings of running the same xquery on two very similar xml files.
For an academic paper, I'm trying to benchmark finding certain successive (windowed) <item> tags inside a <seq> tag. This is the full query:
declare function local:check-sequence($items as element(item)*) as element(item)* { if ($items[1]/@x = $items[2]/@x and $items[2]/@x = $items[3]/@x) then if (sum($items/@y) < 0.5) then $items else () else () };
for $seq in doc("data.xml")//seq return <seq>{ for $i in 1 to (count($seq/item) - 2) let $window := subsequence($seq/item, $i, 3) return <match>{local:check-sequence($window)}</match> }</seq>
Here's the puzzling thing. When I run this on an xml file that has one <seq> with 10000 <item>s, i.e. <seqs><seq> <item>[*10000] </seq></seqs>, I get the following reasonable timings:
- Parsing: 0.63 ms - Compiling: 0.95 ms - Optimizing: 30.59 ms - Evaluating: 11.48 ms - Printing: 0.61 ms - Total Time: 44.27 ms
However, once I run the same query on an xml file with two (!) <seq> of 10000 items each, the runtime does not double, but is now more than 50 times of that of the first query:
- Parsing: 0.6 ms - Compiling: 1.3 ms - Optimizing: 48.13 ms - Evaluating: 2843.67 ms - Printing: 1.12 ms - Total Time: 2894.82 ms
I don't see how I induce any exponential runtimes, and esp. check-sequence should be constant. Am I missing something fundamental here?
The result size of the second version is about twice the size as the result size of the first version.
Thanks in advance for any pointers.
Bernhard Liebl