Hi ElangoI noticed, your code runs faster after you have corrected evaluated XPath, but anyway, one observation from my practice.
In case, you need only one shot processing of the file, and your task fits for use of SAX parser, then the SAX parser will be the most efficient and the fastest.
BaseX will perform much better, if your queries are complex in structure, as it will use very efficient indices.
But if your task is of kind "run through the xml and pick up some values here and there, sum them up and have the result", then SAX is really difficult to beat, because that is what it by design does.
In case, you have to process the same file few times, then XQuery may complete, this depends on real case and scenario.
With best regards
Jan
2013/2/20 elangovan MuthuSwamy
<elangovan.h@gmail.com>
Hi All,
I am trying to use BaseX Client and server with large XML files(13 MB size). I have created a database for the XML and evaluated an xpath in that. When I executed an xpath it takes around 250 milliseconds to fetch the results. In case of SAX parser I could get the response for the same xpath within 5 seconds.
I used following BaseXClient code for this.
BaseXClient session = new BaseXClient("localhost", 1984, "admin", "admin");
// code to fetch the large XML file size. Read from the file.
String xmlString = .......
InputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream(xmlString.getBytes());
session.create("database", bais);
String expression = "/configuration/protocol[starts-with(name, 'http')]/name";
session.query(expression).execute(); // this line takes 250 milliseconds to give the result. Where as same xpath can be executed within 5 milliseconds in SAX parser.
Am I basically missing anything or something else.
Please advice me.
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Elango.
_______________________________________________
BaseX-Talk mailing list
BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk