Hello Jean-Marc,

I am not sure how you are calling BaseX from within Eclipse, I remember there are different ways. Normally, I would expect it to simply execute basex, so there shouldn't be any difference. The query optimization should be done in both cases. However, it could be for example that your BaseX integration in eclipse uses XQJ, which could possibly introduce some performance bottlenecks.

So if you could shortly describe how you set up BaseX within Eclipse, that would be great.

Cheers,
Dirk

On 09/24/2014 06:33 AM, jean-marc Mercier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Happy to write again in this mailing-list, hope you are all doing well guys
> !
>
> I am encountering a small problem running my old xquery modules. I guess
> that it is a classical issue, but I can't remember how to look into BaseX
> archive :(
>
> Here is the description of the problem : I am running a query, calling
> module_of_mine.xqm, on two different environments.
>
> The first one is eclipse, linked to the latest interpreter from
> BaseX80-20140923.183154 (but I tested also against older interpreter). In
> this way, this query saturated my 12 G Java machine after some minutes.
>
> Then I installed module_of_mine.xqm into BaseX repo, and ran the same query
> using basex gui with 4G heap size. The query ran perfectly in some 30 sec.
>
> My first penny guess is that the built-in BaseX xquery profiler is doing
> some nice work there ? If so, is there a way to activate / desactivate this
> profiler from eclipse or from some configuration files ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-Marc
>

--
Dirk Kirsten, BaseX GmbH, http://basex.org
|-- Firmensitz: Blarerstrasse 56, 78462 Konstanz
|-- Registergericht Freiburg, HRB: 708285, Geschäftsführer:
| Dr. Christian Grün, Dr. Alexander Holupirek, Michael Seiferle
`-- Phone: 0049 7531 28 28 676, Fax: 0049 7531 20 05 22