Hi Christian,

Thx, I tested it. It seems that a regression has been introduced : my main process, running in 30sec with 4 Go in memory with BaseX7.8 6aeaebf, never ended with this latest release. Indeed, it started disk-swapping as it is consuming more than 6 Go now (the size heap of my JAVA machine).

Do you have any clue, or suggestion, that could help us finding this regression ?

Cheers,

Jean-Marc

2014-01-30 Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>

Hi Jean-Marc,

you got it right, we fixed the bug! I've just updated the snapshot;
feel free to give it a try!

Thanks,
Christian

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:07 PM, jean-marc Mercier
<jeanmarc.mercier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As bug https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/839 has been closed, I tried
> to upgrade from BaseX7.8 6aeaebf to BaseX beta_4cfa54c.
> Unfortunately, this bug still appears in 4cfa54c, and I rolled back again to
> beta 6aeaebf .
> Did I misunderstoog something ?
>
> Cheers
>

> _______________________________________________
> BaseX-Talk mailing list
> BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
>