Hi Christian,
Attached the most reduced version with wrong result.
Success ;-)
Rob
Van: Christian Grün [mailto:christian.gruen@gmail.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 7 november 2014 18:04
Aan: Rob Stapper
CC: BaseX
Onderwerp: Re: [basex-talk] unexpected behaviour
Hi Rob,
thanks for the example code. Could you possibly reduce it to a shorter snippet that still demonstrates the surprising behavior?
Best,
Christian
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Rob Stapper <r.stapper@lijbrandt.nl> wrote:
Hi,
Running the attached program produces the next evaluation.
Evaluating:
- elementSeq: <A ref="var1"><B><X1/></B></A>
- content0: <X1/>
- content2: <X1/>
- elementSeq: <A ref="var1"><B><X2/></B></A>
- content0: <X2/>
- content2: <X1/>
I can’t explain the value of the last “- content2: ”-trace.
I expect it to be the same value as the last “- content0: ”-trace.
What’s happening here?
- Rob Stapper
Dit e-mailbericht bevat geen virussen en malware omdat avast! Antivirus actief is. |
![]() |
Dit e-mailbericht bevat geen virussen en malware omdat avast! Antivirus actief is. |