11 Jul
2010
11 Jul
'10
6:23 p.m.
To briefly follow up on this comment:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Christian Grün christian.gruen@gmail.comwrote:
Next, as most of our users end up using our own APIs, we haven't put more effort into XQJ. Feedback like yours, however, is welcome to see how XQJ is used in practice, and it might give us some ideas how to possibly extend it in future.
So far, we have not allowed any 'import org.basex.*' in our code. I'm not an expert in XML or Java, but it was my understanding that XQJ is the standard way of operating on XML databases from Java code.
Is it not? If not, what should we use without being tied to a particular XML database implementation?
- Godmar