Christian,
A first clue: I set INLINELIMIT = 0 TAILCALL = -1, and the process ended, even if it is taking now some 3/4 minutes and nearly 5,5 Go memory footprint.
2014-01-30 jean-marc Mercier jeanmarc.mercier@gmail.com
Hi Christian,
Thx, I tested it. It seems that a regression has been introduced : my main process, running in 30sec with 4 Go in memory with BaseX7.8 6aeaebf, never ended with this latest release. Indeed, it started disk-swapping as it is consuming more than 6 Go now (the size heap of my JAVA machine).
Do you have any clue, or suggestion, that could help us finding this regression ?
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
2014-01-30 Christian Grün christian.gruen@gmail.com
Hi Jean-Marc,
you got it right, we fixed the bug! I've just updated the snapshot; feel free to give it a try!
Thanks, Christian
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:07 PM, jean-marc Mercier jeanmarc.mercier@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As bug https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/839 has been closed, I
tried
to upgrade from BaseX7.8 6aeaebf to BaseX beta_4cfa54c. Unfortunately, this bug still appears in 4cfa54c, and I rolled back
again to
beta 6aeaebf . Did I misunderstoog something ?
Cheers
BaseX-Talk mailing list BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk