Hi Andy, hi Adam,
I understand the restxq stuff is in development/experimental and I wonder what plans you have in that direction? I think there are issues/limitations with the url limited to restxq/ and that xqm can be accessed directly (as text) etc, but one limitation of the spec seems to be that one can read a named header or cookie ( chosen at design time ) but not list all headers in the request. I wonder if an extension to get the full serialization of the request in the http:send-request response format might be useful. e.g. %rest:request("{$req}")
maybe we can start some join discussion on the future of RESTXQ? Christian