I stumbled over this while running some JUnit tests of our Applications which uses the embedded version of BaseX. It always seemed to happen when inserting, deleting and then inserting the same documents again. I attached 4 simple xquery files to reproduce it using basexgui, just follow these steps: 1. open basexgui 2. create an empty database 3. run insert_pigs.xq to insert the first document 4. run insert_plants.xq to insert the second document 5. run delete_pigs.xq to delete the first document 6. run delete_plants.xq to delete the second document now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage Some more observations: It does not trigger when using only 1 document. Not sure if it happens with more than 2, I think I have observed that as well. Sometimes closing the database and running optimize on it seems to fix it. Hope that helps to find and fiy the bug, its pretty nasty. BR Herbert
Hi Herbert, First, thanks for the step-by-step procedure.
now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage
My database is still valid after these steps (I can run queries and I can export the full database). I also tried to swap step 7 and 8 (that would probably be the opposite order you mentioned?). This is what I did: 1a. download and unzip BaseX91.zip 1b. start bin/basexgui from the unzipped directory 2. create an empty TEST database via the GUI dialog (and, in the second run, by running db:create('TEST'). 3. run ...etc Some question in return: • How do you detect that your database is garbage after the last step? • Does this also happen with a fresh installation of BaseX (did you change the default options)? • I made no difference in my tests, but how did you create the database? Did you use the GUI features, or did you run db:create('TEST') ? • Could you experience the same behavior on command line? Cheers Christian
Hello, well I am using the latest version 9.1.2 which I downloaded a couple of days ago. I tried it both on Windows 10 and on Ubuntu 18.04, it shows the same behaviour. (sorry, I should have added these detail in the original email already...). The error first appeared way back with version 8.something, but I was unable to pinpoint it as it was very sporadic. I attached a screenshot of how it looks like in basexgui right after step 8. I can reproduce it here anytime. I also tried creating the database via the GUI as well as using xquery, I also played with UPDINDEX and AUTOOPTIMIZE - it did not make any difference. I also attached the broken databases, each with different indexing options as described.
From our Java application the error looks looks this, it is always at the very first query attempt after the databasse has corrupted:
Improper use? Potential bug? Your feedback is welcome: Contact: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Version: BaseX 9.1.2 Java: Oracle Corporation, 1.8.0_162 OS: Windows 10, amd64 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2147483647 at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.fpre(TableDiskAccess.java:502) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.cursor(TableDiskAccess.java:453) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.read1(TableDiskAccess.java:151) at org.basex.data.Data.kind(Data.java:304) at org.basex.query.value.node.DBNode.<init>(DBNode.java:50) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:70) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:1) at org.basex.query.value.seq.Seq$1.get(Seq.java:95) at org.basex.query.iter.BasicIter.next(BasicIter.java:38) at org.basex.query.expr.path.CachedPath.nodeIter(CachedPath.java:42) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:66) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:37) at org.basex.query.func.fn.FnCount.item(FnCount.java:25) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.value(ParseExpr.java:71) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.Let$LetEval.next(Let.java:175) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.GFLWOR$1.next(GFLWOR.java:88) at org.basex.query.QueryContext.next(QueryContext.java:400) at org.basex.query.scope.MainModule$1.next(MainModule.java:122) at org.basex.core.cmd.AQuery.query(AQuery.java:111) at org.basex.core.cmd.XQuery.run(XQuery.java:22) at org.basex.core.Command.run(Command.java:257) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:93) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:116) Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün < christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Herbert,
First, thanks for the step-by-step procedure.
now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage
My database is still valid after these steps (I can run queries and I can export the full database). I also tried to swap step 7 and 8 (that would probably be the opposite order you mentioned?).
This is what I did: 1a. download and unzip BaseX91.zip 1b. start bin/basexgui from the unzipped directory 2. create an empty TEST database via the GUI dialog (and, in the second run, by running db:create('TEST'). 3. run ...etc
Some question in return:
• How do you detect that your database is garbage after the last step? • Does this also happen with a fresh installation of BaseX (did you change the default options)? • I made no difference in my tests, but how did you create the database? Did you use the GUI features, or did you run db:create('TEST') ? • Could you experience the same behavior on command line?
Cheers Christian
I still have no chance to get this reproduced. I would assume that the attached BaseX command script fails on your system, too. Could you execute it and see what happens?
basex script.bxs
You can either run it on command line or in the BaseX GUI (you may need to update the file paths if you launch BaseX from a different directory). If the script runs successfully, we may have tested different things. Could you rewrite the script and send me a version that fails on your system? On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:25 PM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
well I am using the latest version 9.1.2 which I downloaded a couple of days ago. I tried it both on Windows 10 and on Ubuntu 18.04, it shows the same behaviour. (sorry, I should have added these detail in the original email already...). The error first appeared way back with version 8.something, but I was unable to pinpoint it as it was very sporadic. I attached a screenshot of how it looks like in basexgui right after step 8. I can reproduce it here anytime. I also tried creating the database via the GUI as well as using xquery, I also played with UPDINDEX and AUTOOPTIMIZE - it did not make any difference. I also attached the broken databases, each with different indexing options as described.
From our Java application the error looks looks this, it is always at the very first query attempt after the databasse has corrupted:
Improper use? Potential bug? Your feedback is welcome: Contact: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Version: BaseX 9.1.2 Java: Oracle Corporation, 1.8.0_162 OS: Windows 10, amd64 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2147483647 at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.fpre(TableDiskAccess.java:502) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.cursor(TableDiskAccess.java:453) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.read1(TableDiskAccess.java:151) at org.basex.data.Data.kind(Data.java:304) at org.basex.query.value.node.DBNode.<init>(DBNode.java:50) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:70) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:1) at org.basex.query.value.seq.Seq$1.get(Seq.java:95) at org.basex.query.iter.BasicIter.next(BasicIter.java:38) at org.basex.query.expr.path.CachedPath.nodeIter(CachedPath.java:42) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:66) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:37) at org.basex.query.func.fn.FnCount.item(FnCount.java:25) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.value(ParseExpr.java:71) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.Let$LetEval.next(Let.java:175) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.GFLWOR$1.next(GFLWOR.java:88) at org.basex.query.QueryContext.next(QueryContext.java:400) at org.basex.query.scope.MainModule$1.next(MainModule.java:122) at org.basex.core.cmd.AQuery.query(AQuery.java:111) at org.basex.core.cmd.XQuery.run(XQuery.java:22) at org.basex.core.Command.run(Command.java:257) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:93) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:116)
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Herbert,
First, thanks for the step-by-step procedure.
now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage
My database is still valid after these steps (I can run queries and I can export the full database). I also tried to swap step 7 and 8 (that would probably be the opposite order you mentioned?).
This is what I did: 1a. download and unzip BaseX91.zip 1b. start bin/basexgui from the unzipped directory 2. create an empty TEST database via the GUI dialog (and, in the second run, by running db:create('TEST'). 3. run ...etc
Some question in return:
• How do you detect that your database is garbage after the last step? • Does this also happen with a fresh installation of BaseX (did you change the default options)? • I made no difference in my tests, but how did you create the database? Did you use the GUI features, or did you run db:create('TEST') ? • Could you experience the same behavior on command line?
Cheers Christian
I tried the commandline basex both manually and with your script, it works fine there no matter how often I try, not sure why... BR Herbert Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 17:07 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün < christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
I still have no chance to get this reproduced. I would assume that the attached BaseX command script fails on your system, too. Could you execute it and see what happens?
basex script.bxs
You can either run it on command line or in the BaseX GUI (you may need to update the file paths if you launch BaseX from a different directory).
If the script runs successfully, we may have tested different things. Could you rewrite the script and send me a version that fails on your system?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:25 PM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
well I am using the latest version 9.1.2 which I downloaded a couple of
days ago. I tried it both on Windows 10 and on Ubuntu 18.04, it shows the same behaviour. (sorry, I should have added these detail in the original email already...). The error first appeared way back with version 8.something, but I was unable to pinpoint it as it was very sporadic.
I attached a screenshot of how it looks like in basexgui right after step 8. I can reproduce it here anytime. I also tried creating the database via the GUI as well as using xquery, I also played with UPDINDEX and AUTOOPTIMIZE - it did not make any difference. I also attached the broken databases, each with different indexing options as described.
From our Java application the error looks looks this, it is always at the very first query attempt after the databasse has corrupted:
Improper use? Potential bug? Your feedback is welcome: Contact: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Version: BaseX 9.1.2 Java: Oracle Corporation, 1.8.0_162 OS: Windows 10, amd64 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2147483647 at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.fpre(TableDiskAccess.java:502) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.cursor(TableDiskAccess.java:453) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.read1(TableDiskAccess.java:151) at org.basex.data.Data.kind(Data.java:304) at org.basex.query.value.node.DBNode.<init>(DBNode.java:50) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:70) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:1) at org.basex.query.value.seq.Seq$1.get(Seq.java:95) at org.basex.query.iter.BasicIter.next(BasicIter.java:38) at org.basex.query.expr.path.CachedPath.nodeIter(CachedPath.java:42) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:66) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:37) at org.basex.query.func.fn.FnCount.item(FnCount.java:25) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.value(ParseExpr.java:71) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.Let$LetEval.next(Let.java:175) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.GFLWOR$1.next(GFLWOR.java:88) at org.basex.query.QueryContext.next(QueryContext.java:400) at org.basex.query.scope.MainModule$1.next(MainModule.java:122) at org.basex.core.cmd.AQuery.query(AQuery.java:111) at org.basex.core.cmd.XQuery.run(XQuery.java:22) at org.basex.core.Command.run(Command.java:257) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:93) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:116)
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün < christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Herbert,
First, thanks for the step-by-step procedure.
now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database
is now garbage
My database is still valid after these steps (I can run queries and I can export the full database). I also tried to swap step 7 and 8 (that would probably be the opposite order you mentioned?).
This is what I did: 1a. download and unzip BaseX91.zip 1b. start bin/basexgui from the unzipped directory 2. create an empty TEST database via the GUI dialog (and, in the second run, by running db:create('TEST'). 3. run ...etc
Some question in return:
• How do you detect that your database is garbage after the last step? • Does this also happen with a fresh installation of BaseX (did you change the default options)? • I made no difference in my tests, but how did you create the database? Did you use the GUI features, or did you run db:create('TEST') ? • Could you experience the same behavior on command line?
Cheers Christian
Ok, this version of the script you sent me triggers it both in the gui as well as in the commandline version. (I just changed the order a bit) BR Herbert Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 17:19 Uhr schrieb Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com
:
I tried the commandline basex both manually and with your script, it works fine there no matter how often I try, not sure why...
BR Herbert
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 17:07 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün < christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
I still have no chance to get this reproduced. I would assume that the attached BaseX command script fails on your system, too. Could you execute it and see what happens?
basex script.bxs
You can either run it on command line or in the BaseX GUI (you may need to update the file paths if you launch BaseX from a different directory).
If the script runs successfully, we may have tested different things. Could you rewrite the script and send me a version that fails on your system?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:25 PM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
well I am using the latest version 9.1.2 which I downloaded a couple of
days ago. I tried it both on Windows 10 and on Ubuntu 18.04, it shows the same behaviour. (sorry, I should have added these detail in the original email already...). The error first appeared way back with version 8.something, but I was unable to pinpoint it as it was very sporadic.
I attached a screenshot of how it looks like in basexgui right after step 8. I can reproduce it here anytime. I also tried creating the database via the GUI as well as using xquery, I also played with UPDINDEX and AUTOOPTIMIZE - it did not make any difference. I also attached the broken databases, each with different indexing options as described.
From our Java application the error looks looks this, it is always at the very first query attempt after the databasse has corrupted:
Improper use? Potential bug? Your feedback is welcome: Contact: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Version: BaseX 9.1.2 Java: Oracle Corporation, 1.8.0_162 OS: Windows 10, amd64 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2147483647 at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.fpre(TableDiskAccess.java:502) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.cursor(TableDiskAccess.java:453) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.read1(TableDiskAccess.java:151) at org.basex.data.Data.kind(Data.java:304) at org.basex.query.value.node.DBNode.<init>(DBNode.java:50) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:70) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:1) at org.basex.query.value.seq.Seq$1.get(Seq.java:95) at org.basex.query.iter.BasicIter.next(BasicIter.java:38) at org.basex.query.expr.path.CachedPath.nodeIter(CachedPath.java:42) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:66) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:37) at org.basex.query.func.fn.FnCount.item(FnCount.java:25) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.value(ParseExpr.java:71) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.Let$LetEval.next(Let.java:175) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.GFLWOR$1.next(GFLWOR.java:88) at org.basex.query.QueryContext.next(QueryContext.java:400) at org.basex.query.scope.MainModule$1.next(MainModule.java:122) at org.basex.core.cmd.AQuery.query(AQuery.java:111) at org.basex.core.cmd.XQuery.run(XQuery.java:22) at org.basex.core.Command.run(Command.java:257) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:93) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:116)
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün < christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Herbert,
First, thanks for the step-by-step procedure.
now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the
database is now garbage
My database is still valid after these steps (I can run queries and I can export the full database). I also tried to swap step 7 and 8 (that would probably be the opposite order you mentioned?).
This is what I did: 1a. download and unzip BaseX91.zip 1b. start bin/basexgui from the unzipped directory 2. create an empty TEST database via the GUI dialog (and, in the second run, by running db:create('TEST'). 3. run ...etc
Some question in return:
• How do you detect that your database is garbage after the last step? • Does this also happen with a fresh installation of BaseX (did you change the default options)? • I made no difference in my tests, but how did you create the database? Did you use the GUI features, or did you run db:create('TEST') ? • Could you experience the same behavior on command line?
Cheers Christian
Dear Herbert, Thanks for your patience. I created a new issue, we’ll look at this soon [1]. Best, Christian [1] https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/1662 On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 5:29 PM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, this version of the script you sent me triggers it both in the gui as well as in the commandline version. (I just changed the order a bit)
BR Herbert
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 17:19 Uhr schrieb Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com>:
I tried the commandline basex both manually and with your script, it works fine there no matter how often I try, not sure why...
BR Herbert
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 17:07 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
I still have no chance to get this reproduced. I would assume that the attached BaseX command script fails on your system, too. Could you execute it and see what happens?
basex script.bxs
You can either run it on command line or in the BaseX GUI (you may need to update the file paths if you launch BaseX from a different directory).
If the script runs successfully, we may have tested different things. Could you rewrite the script and send me a version that fails on your system?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:25 PM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
well I am using the latest version 9.1.2 which I downloaded a couple of days ago. I tried it both on Windows 10 and on Ubuntu 18.04, it shows the same behaviour. (sorry, I should have added these detail in the original email already...). The error first appeared way back with version 8.something, but I was unable to pinpoint it as it was very sporadic. I attached a screenshot of how it looks like in basexgui right after step 8. I can reproduce it here anytime. I also tried creating the database via the GUI as well as using xquery, I also played with UPDINDEX and AUTOOPTIMIZE - it did not make any difference. I also attached the broken databases, each with different indexing options as described.
From our Java application the error looks looks this, it is always at the very first query attempt after the databasse has corrupted:
Improper use? Potential bug? Your feedback is welcome: Contact: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Version: BaseX 9.1.2 Java: Oracle Corporation, 1.8.0_162 OS: Windows 10, amd64 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2147483647 at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.fpre(TableDiskAccess.java:502) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.cursor(TableDiskAccess.java:453) at org.basex.io.random.TableDiskAccess.read1(TableDiskAccess.java:151) at org.basex.data.Data.kind(Data.java:304) at org.basex.query.value.node.DBNode.<init>(DBNode.java:50) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:70) at org.basex.query.value.seq.DBNodeSeq.itemAt(DBNodeSeq.java:1) at org.basex.query.value.seq.Seq$1.get(Seq.java:95) at org.basex.query.iter.BasicIter.next(BasicIter.java:38) at org.basex.query.expr.path.CachedPath.nodeIter(CachedPath.java:42) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:66) at org.basex.query.expr.path.AxisPath.iter(AxisPath.java:37) at org.basex.query.func.fn.FnCount.item(FnCount.java:25) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.iter(ParseExpr.java:48) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.Constr.add(Constr.java:70) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:93) at org.basex.query.expr.constr.CElem.item(CElem.java:1) at org.basex.query.expr.ParseExpr.value(ParseExpr.java:71) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.Let$LetEval.next(Let.java:175) at org.basex.query.expr.gflwor.GFLWOR$1.next(GFLWOR.java:88) at org.basex.query.QueryContext.next(QueryContext.java:400) at org.basex.query.scope.MainModule$1.next(MainModule.java:122) at org.basex.core.cmd.AQuery.query(AQuery.java:111) at org.basex.core.cmd.XQuery.run(XQuery.java:22) at org.basex.core.Command.run(Command.java:257) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:93) at org.basex.core.Command.execute(Command.java:116)
Am Do., 7. Feb. 2019 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Herbert,
First, thanks for the step-by-step procedure.
now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage
My database is still valid after these steps (I can run queries and I can export the full database). I also tried to swap step 7 and 8 (that would probably be the opposite order you mentioned?).
This is what I did: 1a. download and unzip BaseX91.zip 1b. start bin/basexgui from the unzipped directory 2. create an empty TEST database via the GUI dialog (and, in the second run, by running db:create('TEST'). 3. run ...etc
Some question in return:
• How do you detect that your database is garbage after the last step? • Does this also happen with a fresh installation of BaseX (did you change the default options)? • I made no difference in my tests, but how did you create the database? Did you use the GUI features, or did you run db:create('TEST') ? • Could you experience the same behavior on command line?
Cheers Christian
Hi Herbert, The problem you encountered has been fixed. If all documents were deleted from a database in a specific order, the emptied disk block mapping was not correctly reinitialized. This has been fixed with the latest snapshot [1]. Don’t hesitate and come back to us if you should still encounter unexpected surprises. Thanks, Christian [1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/ On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:06 AM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
I stumbled over this while running some JUnit tests of our Applications which uses the embedded version of BaseX. It always seemed to happen when inserting, deleting and then inserting the same documents again. I attached 4 simple xquery files to reproduce it using basexgui, just follow these steps:
1. open basexgui 2. create an empty database 3. run insert_pigs.xq to insert the first document 4. run insert_plants.xq to insert the second document 5. run delete_pigs.xq to delete the first document 6. run delete_plants.xq to delete the second document now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage
Some more observations: It does not trigger when using only 1 document. Not sure if it happens with more than 2, I think I have observed that as well. Sometimes closing the database and running optimize on it seems to fix it.
Hope that helps to find and fiy the bug, its pretty nasty.
BR Herbert
Great, I will test the snapshot right away. Good work! BR Herbert Mertig Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 12:11 Uhr schrieb Christian Grün < christian.gruen@gmail.com>:
Hi Herbert,
The problem you encountered has been fixed. If all documents were deleted from a database in a specific order, the emptied disk block mapping was not correctly reinitialized.
This has been fixed with the latest snapshot [1]. Don’t hesitate and come back to us if you should still encounter unexpected surprises.
Thanks, Christian
[1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:06 AM Herbert Mertig <h.mertig@gmail.com> wrote:
I stumbled over this while running some JUnit tests of our Applications
which uses the embedded version of BaseX. It always seemed to happen when inserting, deleting and then inserting the same documents again.
I attached 4 simple xquery files to reproduce it using basexgui, just follow these steps:
1. open basexgui 2. create an empty database 3. run insert_pigs.xq to insert the first document 4. run insert_plants.xq to insert the second document 5. run delete_pigs.xq to delete the first document 6. run delete_plants.xq to delete the second document now insert the same 2 documents in the opposite order 7: run insert_pigs.xq 8. run insert_plants.xq <-- this will trigger the error, the database is now garbage
Some more observations: It does not trigger when using only 1 document. Not sure if it happens with more than 2, I think I have observed that as well. Sometimes closing the database and running optimize on it seems to fix it.
Hope that helps to find and fiy the bug, its pretty nasty.
BR Herbert
participants (2)
-
Christian Grün -
Herbert Mertig