I'm trying to use BaseX as a persistence layer in a project (together with XStream). I have a few questions and I'm not having any luck with the documentation. I've gotten pretty far. I have a User object (simplified for this example) with an id (UUID), a username (String), and a password (String). XStream turns this into: <User> <id>98bdb472-97ad-4de1-b1c6-a482d7f06d94</id> <username>Chas</username> <password>secret</password> </User> I've created a DB called "db" (clever, huh?): new CreateDB("cop", "<blog><users/></blog>").execute(context) QUESTION: If I rerun the above, will it overwrite the DB if it already exists, or will it just open the existing DB? Can't find anything in the API about that. Then I save my User like this: new XQuery("insert node" + chas + " into /blog/users").execute(context) where chas is the above XML. This works great! When I need to reinflate the object, I just do: chas = new XQuery(""" for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return $x """).execute(context) Then I use XStream to reinflate the object. Any suggestions for improvement? So now the problem. I need to update this object in the database. The simplest way is just to update the whole object. So I change my username and use XStream to create the new XML: <User> <id>98bdb472-97ad-4de1-b1c6-a482d7f06d94</id> <username>Charles</username> <password>secret</password> </User> I read that one must use put() to export the changes, but maybe I'm misunderstanding this. I'm have this: for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return replace node $x with " + chas This and seems to work, but then when I try to delete the node thus: for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/password="secret" return delete nodes $x It does not work. What am I missing? Thanks for any help. If this thing works, I'm happy to open it up so others can work on it, too. Chas.
Hi Chas,
QUESTION: If I rerun the above, will it overwrite the DB if it already exists, or will it just open the existing DB? Can't find anything in the API about that. This will overwrite the DB.
for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return replace node $x with " + chas this query replaces the whole User-node with your quoted value. So in the deleting query your User-node is not there anymore.
Try out the following: for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return replace value of node $x/username with " + chas Then this one should work: for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/password="secret" return delete nodes $x I hope this helps, dont hesitate to ask for more. Kind regards, Andreas chas@munat.com schrieb:
I'm trying to use BaseX as a persistence layer in a project (together with XStream). I have a few questions and I'm not having any luck with the documentation.
I've gotten pretty far. I have a User object (simplified for this example) with an id (UUID), a username (String), and a password (String). XStream turns this into:
<User> <id>98bdb472-97ad-4de1-b1c6-a482d7f06d94</id> <username>Chas</username> <password>secret</password> </User>
I've created a DB called "db" (clever, huh?):
new CreateDB("cop", "<blog><users/></blog>").execute(context)
QUESTION: If I rerun the above, will it overwrite the DB if it already exists, or will it just open the existing DB? Can't find anything in the API about that.
Then I save my User like this:
new XQuery("insert node" + chas + " into /blog/users").execute(context)
where chas is the above XML.
This works great! When I need to reinflate the object, I just do:
chas = new XQuery(""" for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return $x """).execute(context)
Then I use XStream to reinflate the object.
Any suggestions for improvement?
So now the problem. I need to update this object in the database. The simplest way is just to update the whole object. So I change my username and use XStream to create the new XML:
<User> <id>98bdb472-97ad-4de1-b1c6-a482d7f06d94</id> <username>Charles</username> <password>secret</password> </User>
I read that one must use put() to export the changes, but maybe I'm misunderstanding this. I'm have this:
for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return replace node $x with " + chas
This and seems to work, but then when I try to delete the node thus:
for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/password="secret" return delete nodes $x
It does not work. What am I missing?
Thanks for any help. If this thing works, I'm happy to open it up so others can work on it, too.
Chas.
_______________________________________________ BaseX-Talk mailing list BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
Hi Chas, a nice simplification would be to use XPath instead of full-blown FLWORs for your simple selections: Am 16.08.2010 11:41, schrieb chas@munat.com:
chas = new XQuery(""" for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return $x """).execute(context)
could then be rewritten as chas = new XQuery("/forum/users/User[username='Chas']").execute(context) This can also be applied to the other queries: Am 16.08.2010 12:00, schrieb Andreas Weiler:
for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/username="Chas" return replace value of node $x/username with " + chas
replace value of node /forum/users/User/username[text() = 'Chas'] with 'Charles' (This only works if the username is unique and thus the XPath expression yields a single node.)
Then this one should work:
for $x in /forum/users/User where $x/password="secret" return delete nodes $x
delete nodes /forum/users/User[password='secret'] XQuery is still needed if you want to transform the results in the query. Hope this helps, Cheers Leo
Hello, I think there might be a bug in Data.pre()... When you use Data.id() to get the id for a given pre, it's easy enough to check Data.meta.size to make sure you're not asking for the id of a pre value that's beyond the end of the table since pre values are contiguous and are maintained when the database is updated. However, I've noticed some crashes when asking for the pre value of a given id using Data.pre(). Specifically, if I create a large database and then remove all but a few nodes I have a very large Data.meta.lastid value but a very small Data.meta.size. If I then ask for the pre value for a very large id using Data.pre() that may or may not still be in the database, I often end up with an exception message such as "Invalid Data Access [pre:259, indexSize:3, access:3 > 2]". The expected result would simply be -1. I think the problem is that even though the id I'm asking for is still smaller than my Data.meta.lastid value, it's large enough that after the Data.table has been resized after removing most of the nodes, the call to Data.id() within Data.pre() is probing the table beyond its boundaries as it scans. Did that make sense? Dave
Dave, thanks for the hint. Yes, that absolutely made sense; I guess the following change (which will be uploaded with the next commit) should suffice to fix the problem: Data, line 275: for(int p = 0, ps = Math.min(meta.size, id); p < ps; ++p) if(id == id(p)) return p; Currently, due to its inefficiency, the method in question isn't used anywhere in the code. We're working on an ID-Pre mapping, which will allow us to keep on using existing index structures after update operations. This is work in progress, though; just stay tuned! Christian On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Dave Glick <dglick@dracorp.com> wrote:
Hello,
I think there might be a bug in Data.pre()...
When you use Data.id() to get the id for a given pre, it's easy enough to check Data.meta.size to make sure you're not asking for the id of a pre value that's beyond the end of the table since pre values are contiguous and are maintained when the database is updated.
However, I've noticed some crashes when asking for the pre value of a given id using Data.pre(). Specifically, if I create a large database and then remove all but a few nodes I have a very large Data.meta.lastid value but a very small Data.meta.size. If I then ask for the pre value for a very large id using Data.pre() that may or may not still be in the database, I often end up with an exception message such as "Invalid Data Access [pre:259, indexSize:3, access:3 > 2]". The expected result would simply be -1. I think the problem is that even though the id I'm asking for is still smaller than my Data.meta.lastid value, it's large enough that after the Data.table has been resized after removing most of the nodes, the call to Data.id() within Data.pre() is probing the table beyond its boundaries as it scans.
Did that make sense?
Dave
Excellent, thanks. I know a lot of people are using BaseX through the server and other APIs, but we use it directly and are thankful for the continued development on that front. We also make heavy use of the pre-to-id mapping and are especially grateful for any performance improvements you plan on making there. -----Original Message----- From: Christian Grün [mailto:christian.gruen@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 7:36 PM To: Dave Glick Cc: BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Possible bug in Data.pre()? Dave, thanks for the hint. Yes, that absolutely made sense; I guess the following change (which will be uploaded with the next commit) should suffice to fix the problem: Data, line 275: for(int p = 0, ps = Math.min(meta.size, id); p < ps; ++p) if(id == id(p)) return p; Currently, due to its inefficiency, the method in question isn't used anywhere in the code. We're working on an ID-Pre mapping, which will allow us to keep on using existing index structures after update operations. This is work in progress, though; just stay tuned! Christian On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Dave Glick <dglick@dracorp.com> wrote:
Hello,
I think there might be a bug in Data.pre()...
When you use Data.id() to get the id for a given pre, it's easy enough to check Data.meta.size to make sure you're not asking for the id of a pre value that's beyond the end of the table since pre values are contiguous and are maintained when the database is updated.
However, I've noticed some crashes when asking for the pre value of a given id using Data.pre(). Specifically, if I create a large database and then remove all but a few nodes I have a very large Data.meta.lastid value but a very small Data.meta.size. If I then ask for the pre value for a very large id using Data.pre() that may or may not still be in the database, I often end up with an exception message such as "Invalid Data Access [pre:259, indexSize:3, access:3 > 2]". The expected result would simply be -1. I think the problem is that even though the id I'm asking for is still smaller than my Data.meta.lastid value, it's large enough that after the Data.table has been resized after removing most of the nodes, the call to Data.id() within Data.pre() is probing the table beyond its boundaries as it scans.
Did that make sense?
Dave
By the way, I did notice the IDPREMAPON flag and that it's currently set to false. Is that ready for use yet, or is it mostly for internal testing right now? -----Original Message----- From: Dave Glick Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:18 AM To: 'Christian Grün' Cc: 'BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de' Subject: RE: [basex-talk] Possible bug in Data.pre()? Excellent, thanks. I know a lot of people are using BaseX through the server and other APIs, but we use it directly and are thankful for the continued development on that front. We also make heavy use of the pre-to-id mapping and are especially grateful for any performance improvements you plan on making there. -----Original Message----- From: Christian Grün [mailto:christian.gruen@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 7:36 PM To: Dave Glick Cc: BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Possible bug in Data.pre()? Dave, thanks for the hint. Yes, that absolutely made sense; I guess the following change (which will be uploaded with the next commit) should suffice to fix the problem: Data, line 275: for(int p = 0, ps = Math.min(meta.size, id); p < ps; ++p) if(id == id(p)) return p; Currently, due to its inefficiency, the method in question isn't used anywhere in the code. We're working on an ID-Pre mapping, which will allow us to keep on using existing index structures after update operations. This is work in progress, though; just stay tuned! Christian On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Dave Glick <dglick@dracorp.com> wrote:
Hello,
I think there might be a bug in Data.pre()...
When you use Data.id() to get the id for a given pre, it's easy enough to check Data.meta.size to make sure you're not asking for the id of a pre value that's beyond the end of the table since pre values are contiguous and are maintained when the database is updated.
However, I've noticed some crashes when asking for the pre value of a given id using Data.pre(). Specifically, if I create a large database and then remove all but a few nodes I have a very large Data.meta.lastid value but a very small Data.meta.size. If I then ask for the pre value for a very large id using Data.pre() that may or may not still be in the database, I often end up with an exception message such as "Invalid Data Access [pre:259, indexSize:3, access:3 > 2]". The expected result would simply be -1. I think the problem is that even though the id I'm asking for is still smaller than my Data.meta.lastid value, it's large enough that after the Data.table has been resized after removing most of the nodes, the call to Data.id() within Data.pre() is probing the table beyond its boundaries as it scans.
Did that make sense?
Dave
Hi Dave, Am 18.08.2010 14:48, schrieb Dave Glick:
By the way, I did notice the IDPREMAPON flag and that it's currently set to false. Is that ready for use yet, or is it mostly for internal testing right now?
these data structures are still in an early state of development and aren't safe to use yet. Sorry for that... Cheers, Leo
Leo - no problem. I'm just glad some work is being done in the area and looking forward to when it's more stable. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard Wörteler [mailto:leonard.woerteler@uni-konstanz.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:01 AM To: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de Cc: Dave Glick Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Possible bug in Data.pre()? Hi Dave, Am 18.08.2010 14:48, schrieb Dave Glick:
By the way, I did notice the IDPREMAPON flag and that it's currently set to false. Is that ready for use yet, or is it mostly for internal testing right now?
these data structures are still in an early state of development and aren't safe to use yet. Sorry for that... Cheers, Leo
participants (5)
-
Andreas Weiler -
chas＠munat.com -
Christian Grün -
Dave Glick -
Leonard Wörteler