Hi Agnieszka,

while I was never participating in any ParGram meeting or event. always was somewhat curious, it would be interesting to hear more about the goals, as Joan said.

From a strategic perspective, and also after some conversation at some workshop at ESSLLI the other day, I would be willing (and maybe I am not the only one) to support activities related to grammar and grammar engineering in the CL/NLP domain. Traction into the semantic and pragmatic domain would also be of interest.

Would you also envision to broaden the perspectives and include other grammar related computational frameworks (e.g., GF), or even other theoretical frameworks?

Thanks a lot!

DC

-----Original Message-----

From: Agnieszka Patejuk <agnieszka.patejuk@googlemail.com>

To: pargram <pargram@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>, xle@mailman.uni-konstanz.de, lfg-list@mailman.uni-konstanz.de, parsem@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

Subject: [XLE] restarting ParGram?

Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:59:57 +0100

Hi,

I am sending this message to all potentially relevant lists (ParGram,

XLE, LFG, ParSem) so as to maximise the chance that it will reach

people who are interested in this topic. If you know someone who might

be interested but is not subscribed to these lists, please consider

letting them know.

The question is: who would be interested in restarting ParGram meetings?

I am not sure what would be the best way to organise this discussion,

so I am suggesting the following:

• if you think your answer might be of interest to many people (for

instance, it might spark a discussion), please consider replying to

the list(s)

• if not, please reply only to me – I will later go through the

responses and post a summary to the relevant lists.

I hope that later we can discuss this topic in more detail with people

who have expressed interest.

All best,

Agnieszka