Hi Andy, hi Adam,
> I understand the restxq stuff is in development/experimental and I wonder
> what plans you have in that direction?
> I think there are  issues/limitations  with the url limited to restxq/ and
> that xqm can be accessed directly (as text) etc, but one limitation of the
> spec seems to be that one can read a named header or cookie ( chosen at
> design time ) but not list all headers in the request.
> I wonder if an extension to get the full serialization of the request in the
> http:send-request response format might be useful. e.g.
> %rest:request("{$req}")
maybe we can start some join discussion on the future of RESTXQ?
Christian